Licence this technology.
The inventor has developed and patented a device that removes multiple forms of greenhouse gas and particulate matter from the internal combustion engine both within the vertical and horizontal exhaust pipes.
If the device is to be installed to work with or replace catalytic converters, the world would benefit due to a significant reduction in greenhouse gases and particulate matter. The organizations that use this technology will see significant new revenues and savings from paying for carbon offset credits.
The creator of Zero-E would like to licence this technology to businesses, like yours, that have manufacturing capability and an established distribution network in the exhaust pipe systems and/or automotive industry.
Zero-E can give your future and current clients the environmental benefits of an electric car while not having the deficiencies that is associated with an electric vehicle or catalytic converter.
The inventor is currently seeking a qualified company to manufacture and distribute Zero-E under a licensing contract. Zero-E is truly a revolutionary innovation that eliminates particulate matter and multiple forms of greenhouse gases directly from the source. It allows the user to use their current gas-powered vehicles with better positive results as an electric vehicle without compromise.
Stop paying for carbon credits for using your vehicle(s), not knowing where the money goes or what is the money even used for.
Stop paying the approximately $125 or more fine that some police officers would give out to some drivers for having their vehicles running idle.
Ask yourself this. If you own and drive an electric vehicle. What will happen when there is a curtailment of electric power resulting in a brownout or a blackout for both short-term or even long-term periods?
Unfortunately, some people steal catalytic converters to harvest and resell expensive precious metals. Something needs to be done to make it harder for people to profit from this illegal activity.



Zero-Ethe logical solution to air pollution.
- Zero-E is a revolutionary innovation that eliminates particulate matter and multiple forms of greenhouse gases directly from the source.
- It allows the user to use their current gas-powered vehicles with the same positive results as an electric vehicle without any negative compromises.
- Zero-E addresses the deficiencies of the catalytic converter and the electric vehicle.
- Both electric vehicles and catalytic converters are by far more expensive and require more non-renewable materials, by stripping the environment to acquire them.
Here are the deficiencies of the catalytic converter.
Catalytic converters are crucial components in vehicle exhaust systems designed to reduce harmful emissions by converting pollutants into less toxic substances. While catalytic converters are vital in mitigating air pollution, they are not without their challenges and potential deficiencies. Here are some aspects where catalytic converters may face limitations:
Limited Effectiveness for Certain Pollutants:
Nitrogen Oxides (NOx): Traditional catalytic converters are not as effective in reducing nitrogen oxides (NOx), which are contributors to air pollution and can lead to smog formation. Advanced technologies, such as selective catalytic reduction (SCR) systems, are often used to specifically target NOx emissions.
Temperature Sensitivity:
Cold Start Issues: Catalytic converters require a certain operating temperature to be effective. During the cold start of a vehicle, especially in colder climates, the converter may not reach optimal temperature quickly, resulting in higher emissions during this phase.
Catalyst Deactivation:
Contaminants: Catalytic converters can be deactivated or impaired by contaminants such as lead, sulphur, and phosphorus present in some fuels. These contaminants can lead to the degradation of the catalyst over time.
Limited Lifespan:
Catalyst Deterioration: Over time, the catalytic material within the converter can deteriorate, reducing its efficiency. This degradation may be influenced by factors such as driving conditions, fuel quality, and maintenance practices.
Dependency on Fuel Quality:
Sulpfur Content: High sulphur content in fuel can lead to the formation of sulphur dioxide, which can harm the catalytic converter and reduce its effectiveness. Using low-sulfur fuels is recommended to minimize this issue.
Selective Emission Reduction:
Limited to Certain Pollutants: Catalytic converters primarily target specific pollutants, such as carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and hydrocarbons. They may not address other pollutants, such as particulate matter, which requires additional emission control measures.
Precious Metal Dependency:
Platinum, Palladium, Rhodium: Catalytic converters contain precious metals like platinum, palladium, and rhodium, which can make them expensive and subject to supply chain issues. Recycling efforts for these metals are crucial to reducing environmental impact and reliance on mining.
Something to keep in mind is that because of the precious metals contained within. Catalytic converters are often stolen to extract precious metals. Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) systems are very pricey, just like catalytic converters. Nitrogen oxides (NOx) and Nitrous Oxides (N2O) are generated by the catalytic converter as a byproduct. These are two greenhouse gases. It is because of the shortcomings of both electric vehicles and the catalytic converters that the need for Zero-E would come in.

Here’s a list of the negative impacts of electric vehicles.
While electric vehicles (EVs) are initially considered to be more environmentally friendly than traditional internal combustion engine vehicles, they are not without many negative impacts. It’s essential to consider the entire life cycle of electric vehicles, from manufacturing to end-of-life disposal. Here are some potential negative impacts associated with electric vehicles:
Manufacturing Environmental Impact:
Resource Extraction: The production of electric vehicle batteries requires the extraction of raw materials such as lithium, cobalt, and nickel. Mining and processing these materials can lead to environmental degradation and human rights concerns in some regions. In some African countries, Congo for example.
There is a large number of young boys and men who create tunnels without reinforced structures while mining for raw materials. Unfortunately, many of them are buried alive in collapsed tunnels.
The young girls and women, try to clean the raw materials in rivers. The result is that they contaminate their water source and poison the village’s drinking water.
Manufacturers of electric vehicles want the raw materials by any means possible, but they want to overlook or not be accountable for all the violations of basic human rights.
Energy Intensive: Manufacturing electric vehicles, especially their batteries, is energy-intensive. The production process, if relying on fossil fuels, can contribute to additional greenhouse gas emissions.
Battery Production and Recycling:
Limited Battery Lifespan: Electric vehicle batteries have a limited lifespan, typically around 8 to 15 years. After this period, they may need replacement, and the disposal of used batteries raises concerns about environmental impact and recycling challenges in developing countries.
Toxic Materials: Batteries often contain toxic materials, such as lithium, cobalt, and nickel. Improper disposal or lack of effective recycling methods can result in the release of these substances into the environment. It’s more than likely that when people eventually dispose of large amounts of used batteries that might be damaged and exposed. Some people will just load it in shipping containers and send it somewhere else so that it can eventually contaminate the physical ground in a foreign country.
Electricity Generation Impact:
Energy Source: The environmental benefits of electric vehicles depend on the source of the electricity used to charge them. If the electricity comes from fossil fuels, the overall impact on carbon emissions may be reduced but not eliminated. Electric vehicles are powered in most cases by non-renewable energy sources. Ask yourself this. Where does the electric power come from?
Renewable Energy Transition: Some politicians would like to convince people to a full transition to electric vehicles, and the elimination of gasoline-powered vehicles thinking that it will be more beneficial when coupled with renewable energy sources for electricity generation. The truth is that electric vehicles have problems holding an electric charge and become compromised when exposed to extreme hot/cold temperature differences. EV’s batteries can fail to perform, die and/or even catch on fire spontaneously, multiple times even after firemen initially put out the fire. All electric vehicles lose a percentage of their maximum distance per year.
Infrastructure Challenges:
Charging Infrastructure: The expansion of charging infrastructure for electric vehicles can have land use and environmental impacts. For example, the construction of new charging stations may lead to habitat disruption or increased energy demand. The charging infrastructure is unstable and unreliable. In the state of California, they want to restrict the user to when they can use their air conditioning systems at their residence and/or workplace and when they can charge their vehicles. Some people would say that the price to charge their vehicle is not standardized and places may already have people waiting for their turn. Instead of spending five minutes at a gas station. Electric vehicle owners might have to wait hours in their vehicles.
Vehicle Production and Disposal:
Complex Manufacturing: Electric vehicles often have complex manufacturing processes due to their advanced technologies. This complexity can increase the environmental footprint associated with production.
End-of-Life Disposal: Proper disposal of electric vehicles and their components is essential to avoid environmental contamination. Developing effective recycling systems for electric vehicle components is a challenge that needs to be addressed.
Electric vehicles have additional problems that many politicians are not willing to mention. In a recent survey, more than half of American drivers are not interested in buying an electric vehicle. Car dealerships have more than a year’s supply of EVs on their parking lots that can’t be sold even at reduced prices.
When it comes to maintenance and insurance, be prepared to pay much more per month. Range anxiety is the main concern that people have. For those who have an EV, they are required to dedicate additional hours waiting for their vehicle to charge. Insurance companies are charging their clients higher rates for owning an EV. If your EV is damaged, be prepared to get a quote of more than $15,000 to replace the battery pack. EVs have a much lower resale value than their gas-powered engine counterparts simply because it is hard to know the condition of the battery pack.
It’s important to note that many of these negative impacts are subject to ongoing research and billions of dollars in development efforts. The industry is actively working to improve the sustainability of electric vehicles by enhancing battery technologies, optimizing manufacturing processes, and promoting responsible resource management and recycling practices. As technology advances and the industry evolves, it is expected that some of these challenges will be mitigated.
Something to keep in mind is that because of the precious metals contained within. Catalytic converters are often stolen to extract precious metals. Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) systems are very pricey, just like catalytic converters. Nitrogen oxides (NOx) and Nitrous Oxides (N2O) are generated by the catalytic converter as a byproduct. These are greenhouse gases. It is because of the shortcomings of both electric vehicles and the catalytic converters that the need for Zero-E would considered as a logical choice.

"Forests are the lungs of our land."
Franklin D. Roosevelt